Candidate rediscovery and matching over your ATS
A matching system designed to score your own ATS history against a new requisition — resurfacing past candidates who fit before a recruiter re-posts the job board. It ranks and surfaces options for a human to decide, and never auto-rejects or makes a hiring call on its own.
An illustrative example of a system we can build — not a client engagement, and with no measured results.
The challenge
The best candidates for a new role are often already in the ATS, sourced for a req that closed a year ago. But old records are impossible to search by fit, so recruiters re-post job boards and re-source from scratch — paying twice for people the agency already knows.
How we'd build it
- We'd build a matching model that scores candidates in your own ATS against a new req's real requirements, ranked by fit
- We'd learn from your placement history — which past matches worked — rather than keyword-matching a resume to a job title
- We'd surface a ranked shortlist with the reasoning for each, so a recruiter reviews and decides who to actually reach out to
- We'd keep a hard human-in-the-loop line: the system ranks and surfaces, it never auto-rejects or makes a hiring decision
What it's designed to deliver
- Designed to resurface fitting candidates from your own history first, so recruiters redeploy instead of re-sourcing
- Built to rank by real fit and past outcomes, not a brittle keyword match on a job title
- Intended to assist judgment, not replace it — a recruiter always makes the call, which also keeps you on the right side of fairness
- Handed over as models and code on your infrastructure — it acts on your candidate history, owned by you, no lock-in
And like everything we build, you'd own it
What to expect
No. This is an illustrative example of a system Plenaura can build — not a delivered client engagement, and it carries no measured client results. We're a pre-launch studio building our first projects, and we won't present invented case studies as real.
Yes. Like everything we build, you own 100% of the code, models, and infrastructure, deployed under your control — no vendor lock-in and no platform fees.
It's scoped per project on a timeline agreed in writing before any work starts. A single focused capability ships faster than a fully connected system; we lock scope and timeline up front so there's no open-ended drift.
Want a system like this? Let's scope it.
Tell us the problem. We'll map the system and scope it with you — or give an honest no.